A 2.5-day International Winter Course
29 November - 1 December 2017, Vienna, Austria
- Research councils and research foundations;
- Managers of University research;
- All professionals involved in stimulating societal impact of science
Background and Goals
Science funders and research programme designers are constantly challenged to maintain an effective and efficient science funding system, while justifying the investments in scientific research towards their stakeholders. As a result of the economic downturn and the increased understanding of the limitations of existing justification frameworks, the pressure increases on governmental and non-governmental science funding organisations to increase the extent to which they demonstrate the socio-economical and societal returns on their investments in science.
In all parts of the world, experts are working on improving the process of measuring and demonstrating the impact of science on society. In the past years, new methods have been developed to better justify and demonstrate the societal impact of scientific research by universities and research institutions. Increasingly, research councils do not just ask to promise impact of new research ideas, but also to plan activities to involve stakeholders and realise impact. Universities and universities of applied sciences develop impact strategies at regional and sectoral level.
The challenge is also for the science policymakers and the other stakeholders to address. Together they have to develop effective systems for the particular scientific climate in their country. A number of systems have been set up to address this challenge – often initiated or stimulated by the science funding organisations: The Research Excellence Framework (REF) in the UK, the National Science Foundation (NSF) in the US and the EU research programs such as Horizon2020.
During this interactive training course, experts from multiple countries, leading the innovation in research funding approaches, will discuss their experiences. They provide insights on how you can organise a research strategy in such a way that it strengthens societal impact.
The course-directors are working hard on creating this year's programme, which will be published shortly. For an idea of what it will look like: Check last year's programme here!
He has over 25 years of experience in science policy, research on the dynamics of science and science policy, and on the policy instruments used for science policy. He regularly advised governments, parliament, funding organisations and research institutes on matters of science and innovation policy. Recent research includes projects on the future of universities, academic careers and the organisation of challenge driven research. Barend van der Meulen's publications research a wide range of science policy issues, including research evaluation, the role of foresight, the history of the Dutch science system, the 'Europeanization' of science, and research funding.
Recently, he was expert member of panels of the innovation review of Sweden, the evaluation of research councils in Lithuania and Hungary and for the review of the EU-Australia S&T agreement. He is chair of the Scientific Integrity Committee of the Wageningen University and Research, member of the Board of the Graduate School WTMC and member of the international advisory board of the Research master Cultures of Arts, Science and Technology at Maastricht University.
She has over 20 years of strategic evaluation experience in health care and health research and innovation. Her expertise is in developing performance management, evaluation and impact assessment strategies as well as implementing measurement frameworks for various systems, organizations and programs. She and her team customized the implementation of the Canadian Academy of Health Sciences (2009) research impact assessment framework. Kathryn is an adviser on numerous national and international committees that focus on the assessment of research and innovation and invited to presentnationally and internationally.
Quotes by participants of the 2016 course
"Three days of very balanced insights and a great network that will help me in the future. Looking forward to the next course!"
"A wide variety of different points of view and expertises of the trainers, and the diverse group of participants."
"I expected the course also to be quite vague, as the topic societal impact is vague. But I gota lot of concrete input to take home."
"I loved getting the chance to have in depth talks with research administrators and having human input on the development in this area."
"Informative, friendly and useful. I would recommend the course to research managers everywhere to enhance their understanding, and engagement in the development and delivery of impact strategies"